Windows, Mac, and Linux Learning Curves

I’m currently using a PC running Windows, thinking about either purchasing a Mac iBook or installing Linux on this computer. These three major operating systems for consumers have different intended audience. I thought about how each OS is different in terms of learning to use it to the max. Here it is.

Microsoft Windows XP

As the most popular consumer operating system, Windows XP makes it easy for anyone to use a computer and access simple data. Its learning curve:

In the beginning, a user can grab a mouse and start clicking any file and start editting the documents they want. While Windows can do more, problems occur. When this happens, the user (sometimes) sees the blue screen of death. Unless s/he gets a tech support to fix whatever that’s broken, the computer is useless. So as time passes on, the user doesn’t learn much about the real deal with Windows. After the user has been frustrated with the errors for a couple of months or years, the will of wanting to fix the problems grows. Then comes all the DOS, Network, and Registry stuff that the user has to learn about before knowing that s/he is being brainwashed by Microsoft by using MSN Messenger, Internet Explorer, and all that other default applications that come pre-installed with Windows.

When a user gets to this level of realization, the thought of alternative applications and even operating systems come into place.

Apple Macintosh

Even though I don’t own a Mac, I’ve had experience with them, as well as other Apple products (iTunes). The learning curve of apple products:

Apple claims Mac OS X as the “most advanced operating system in the world.” It attracts users with its slick interface and jelly-like buttons. Macs are powerful to the extent that many things don’t need to be customized to work, thus giving users a easy step up. However, since most of us are brainwashed by Windows, new Mac users aren’t familiar with its style and usage. Therefore, they once again learn about a whole new world of OS. The result is that the average Mac user is very familiar with the OS.

However, after a while, they realize that something isn’t right. They find that Macs can’t do some things, either limited by the fact that Macs are unsupported by some programs or Macs simply can’t be that compatible. Users once again try to learn, but fail because really, there is not much to learn anymore. That hump in the middle of the learning curve indicates this pro-wanna-be behaviour. Macs are too enclosed. After that, disappointed and discouraged users don’t see much improvement in their favourite OS and don’t learn much either.

Linux

Day to day people (non technical people) haven’t even heard about Linux or Unix. Once the frustration of using a crappy computer forces them to look for reliable alternatives, they come to Linux. At this point, the user’s computer knowledge is up to the point that s/he knows about Open Source and the popular trends on the Internet (ie. blogging). The Linux learning curve:

It requires a lot to start with a *nix system. Knowing the kernal and core applications takes time. Just installing Linux on a PC will teach the user a lot about the system. The user will learn about how a computer works — hardware and software. S/he sees code, programming languages, packages, and compilers. By then, the word geek comes naturally when applied to the user.

post a comment9 Comments

  1. 1August 22nd, 2005Leo Kent says

    Microsoft have managed to make Windows XP pretty idiot proof and I think you would have to try pretty hard to get a BSoD. But then again I am the type of person who reinstalls his operating system practically daily so wouldn’t notice.

    Linux is not for the faint hearted, it’s fine if everything works as it should. But as soon as it goes wrong, things start getting tricky. Drivers, although many are availible, can be the biggest problem of *nix PC’s.

  2. 2August 22nd, 2005Jeff Wheeler says

    I disagree about Mac. I think there is a long time where you can simply open files with a click.

    Also, your comparison is unfair because on Win, you expect a user never to have used a computer before, and on Mac, you expect them to be used to the alternative.

    I feel your graphs would be switched if you used Mac.

  3. 3August 22nd, 2005Oliver Zheng says

    I knew you would say that Jeff! You are the most loyal mac loyalist I know :P Yeah I agree the graphs aren’t based on the same level. That’s basically how I felt using Windows, switching to Mac (at school), and then Linux.

    Leo, Linux is just really different. It takes some time (a long time actually) getting used to. I haven’t gotten used to anything *nix yet, but it does seem kool not having the Windows bugs.

  4. 4August 22nd, 2005Nyaa says

    Macs are absolute evil. I despise them with every fibre of my being. *laughs* Nah, I’m not that bad, but I have a serious aversion to macs. Pretty, but useless OS in my opinion. I like your take on all of those. Windows is just easy and useful and widely used everywhere, and Linux is for the hardcore, so yeah, that about sums it up. I can’t believe I’m actually saying this, but Go Windows! XD

  5. 5August 23rd, 2005anonymuis says

    I am also thinking to buy an Mac iBook (maybe PowerBook), I am still learning as I’ve never used Mac before, I currently have windows, lots of softwares are only able for windows, Mac isn’t that familiar, I meant, not so famous in this country.

  6. 6August 23rd, 2005Cool says

    Erm, you guys are REALLY stupid if you buy a mac now. wait 1 - 2 years and you’ll find out tardfs

  7. 7August 31st, 2005James says

    No bias there. You must still be living in the late 90’s windows world. I have a father in law, who truely is the stereotypical idiot when it comes to computers, and even he can’t crash windows.

    Macs are as easy out of the box as Windows, the learning curve stops when people realize that it’s limited with certain things. Still a solid OS.

    Linux is for geeks.

  8. 8August 31st, 2005Oliver Zheng says

    Linux is for geeks.

    Exactly.

  9. 9September 4th, 2005Tian says

    windows is still the best, not because it can out perform any of the other three, but because everybody uses it. AND all games support windows.

Post a Comment

Name and email are required (website is optional). Basic HTML is enabled.

Your email address is not revealed to anyone.